At the premiere of Loving Vincent held, appropriately enough, at the National Gallery I asked Hugh Welchman, the director why he thought genius is often not recognised during the lifetime of its owner.
‘Geniuses see the world in a new way, often contradictory to the culture around them,’ he said. ‘Van Gogh was a revolutionary and with all revolutionaries it takes the world time to catch up.
You also have to remember that Vincent wasn’t very good at talking. In his letters he speaks beautifully and, of-course, his paintings movie people greatly but he couldn’t do the day to day communication very well.’
Welchman also believes Van Gogh is an inspiring example for us all. ‘We tend to think that geniuses are born. I’ve made films about composers like Chopin who could play all sorts of stuff at age two and so on but Vincent didn’t pick up a paint brush until he was 29. He’d failed at four careers and his family had written him off. But now look at his legacy.’
Indeed. In 1990 a Van Gogh painting sold for over $82 million.
Van Gogh has been immortalized in pop culture before. In the gorgeous, tender song Vincent by Don Mclean there is line which a friend of mine considers to be, perhaps, the saddest in pop lyrics – ‘But I could have told you, Vincent, this world was never meant for one as beautiful as you.’ Stories of how he cut off his ear and sent it to a prostitute have become the stuff of legend and even comedy sketches.
Largely dismissed during his lifetime and sometimes cruelly treated, he has also been the subject of film before, most famously in the 1956 drama Lust for Life starring Kirk Douglas.
However, Loving Vincent, is a whole new beast. Seven years in the making, it is the first ever fully hand painted feature film. Painted in the style of Van Gogh, it took 125 artists from 20 countries to create. A few of them were at the LFF premiere at the National Gallery. One told me that she became involved after seeing the trailer on Facebook and simply applying to be considered. ‘5000, artists applied,’ she said, ‘ and 90 were chosen from the applicants. We spent three weeks in training, basically learning to get rid of our own painting style and to paint like Van Gogh. We were all painters not animators. We had to learn animation.’
Basically, the film recreates the paintings of Van Gogh with actors against green-screen, with the artists painting over 65,000 frames to reflect the artist’s style. Welchman explained that each frame took 6 hours to complete, so that it took two weeks to create one second of film. In total the film took two years to paint. (Some of the paintings from it are now available to buy).
The financing of the project took longer. ‘Which film will it play like’ was a common question.
‘Nothing,’ Welchman replied. ‘This has never been done before!’
The finished film has been sold to 135 countries. The painters are, apparently, all game to try another project and a horror film based on Goya’s paintings is in the works.
There’s no question Loving Vincent is an astonishing achievement, breathtaking in its depth and richness on all levels. Needless to say, it is extraordinarily beautiful visually but it also has an involving story. It is not, however, a biography. Instead the film plays like a murder mystery with an element of film noir which is seen in the black and white scenes which contrast with the vivid colours of Van Gogh’s work.
It is 1891.Vincent Van Gogh (Robert Gulaczyk) a talented man with mental health issues, has been dead for a year, having shot and killed himself. Armand Roulin (Douglas Booth) son of the postmaster who used to deliver Van Gogh’s daily letters to his brother and benefactor, Theo Van Gogh, is charged with delivering Van Gogh’s final letter to his brother. However, Roulin discovers that Theo has also died. In the course of seeking out Vincent’s treating doctor to give the letter to, Roulin starts to trace the final months of Van Gogh’s life and unearth exactly how he actually died. He comes across an array of characters from Van Gogh’s paintings who each has something to say about the artist; some good, some bad. Recognisable faces pop up everywhere, Saoirse Ronan, Helen Mccrory, Chris O’Dowd, Jerome Flynn, to name a few. Soon Roulin finds himself in the role of reluctant detective. Did Vincent Van Gogh really kill himself or was there an element of foul play?
I recommend this film highly.
The Little Stranger ★★★★
Adapted from the Booker prize nominated novel by Sarah Waters, the cinematic incarnation of The Little Stranger has much to live up to.
Released: 21st September 2018
Director: Lenny Abrahamson
Cast: Domhnall Gleeson, Ruth Wilson, Charlotte Rampling, Will Poulter, Liv Hill
Reviewed By: Sinead Beverland
Adapted from the Booker prize nominated novel by Sarah Waters, the cinematic incarnation of The Little Stranger has much to live up to. At the helm is Room Director Lenny Abrahamson, with an impressive cast including Domhnall Gleeson, Ruth Wilson and Charlotte Rampling.
Set shortly after the second world war, Doctor Faraday (Gleeson) introduces us to the faded grandeur of Hundreds Hall, a place he envied feverishly as a child. Having belonged to the Ayres family for several generations, the house is now inhabited by just Mrs Ayres (Rampling) and her two adult children, Roderick (Will Poulter) and Caroline (Wilson). When Faraday is called to the house to visit the unwell young housemaid Betty, he recollects his childhood adulation of the place. Remembering the presence of a young girl, he is told that this was Mrs Ayres first daughter, Susan, who had died as a child. It seems the spectre of Susan (affectionately known as Suki) still lays heavily over the house, as housemaid Betty tells Faraday she fears something ‘isn’t right’. As he becomes more entwined with the family and their home, strange events begin to raise concerns and individually threaten members of the family.
From the very outset, the film breeds an unsettling feeling, the house is imposing with long shots conveying the sense that the characters are being observed. The audience follows Faraday in to this fading world of status and money, sensing his childhood desire and starched formality. The family are equally intriguing and unnerving. Roderick, badly injured during the war, is now an invalid struggling to cope and disturbed by the sense that something in the house does not want him there. Matriarch Mrs Ayres seems to be doing her best to keep the past alive and daughter Caroline (the best of the bunch as attested to by a fellow doctor) seems strong yet vulnerable. When Faraday begins an intriguing friendship with Caroline, their relationship evolves to hinge the entire ethereal story together. With fantastic performances all round, the characters all emerge fully formed, conveying depth without the need for swathes of expository back story.
The terror of the film gradually reveals itself, impacting in set scenes that are truly disturbing and realistic. Director Abrahamson has a subtle touch (as seen in the Oscar Nominated Room) and these climactic scenes engulf you, whilst revealing the fate of certain characters. Abrahamson knows how to accentuate the fear for the audience and uses restraint to devastating effect. As the house leaks secrets and the memory of the deceased Susan comes to the forefront, the story is told with an intensity that uses strikingly rich music and extreme close ups to create a claustrophobic atmosphere. However, to reveal too much of the story here, would spoil the experience of discovering for yourself what is happening at Hundreds Hall.
The Little Stranger is a mature and nuanced film, layered in such a way that it address status and class alongside desire and emotion. The period setting is detailed and worn, bridging the gap between transitioning eras in Britain. This is no straightforward horror or ghost story and the film certainly feels to have done justice to its excellent source material. Rich in theme, characters and style, I would gladly take The Little Stranger home.
Released: 19th October 2018
Directed By: Matteo Garrone
Starring: Marcello Fonte
Reviewed By: Rhys Handley
Dogman is the anti-Paddington. Antithetical to the marmalade-loving bear’s enduring mantra – “if we are kind and polite, the world will be right” – dog groomer Marcello (Marcello Fonte) carves out a life in the dilapidated outskirts of Rome modestly tending to his estate’s canine residents and enjoying the respect of his neighbours.
But Marcello’s submissive, accommodating kindness is pushed closer and closer to its limit by the hulking Simone (a terrifying Edoardo Pesce, surely masked in near-mutant prosthetic), a brutish ex-boxer who stalks the estate terrorising the residents. Unable to say no to a friend, Marcello facilitates Simone’s egregious coke habit to little recompense.
When Simone’s scheme to rob a nearby jeweller’s implicates Marcello and he is apprehended by the police, the Dogman takes the fall himself and goes inside for a year for the sake of the bully who pretends to be his friend. When he comes out, something has changed.
Marcello, diminutive and always sporting a toothy grin, strikes an unimpressive, but likeable figure. He is perfectly happy with his lot as the film opens – a divorced father who takes pride in his work and loves trips to the beach with his daughter. While director Matteo Garrone makes a meal of the grim, filthy aesthetic of the film’s setting, he peppers in moments of levity and blissful tranquility to reinforce the humble satisfaction of Marcello’s daily life.
To see him repeatedly indulge the cruel, selfish whims of Simone quickly becomes a source of frustration, as the brute encourages vices in Marcello that seems entirely at odds with his persona. Marcello is swept away on break-ins and hedonistic strip club nights in jarring scenes more in keeping with Garrone’s work in the gangster canon such as 2008’s Gomorrah.
In these scenes, the toxicity fuelling Marcello reveals itself. Fonte delicately skews the kindly facade when Marcello enters Simone’s world. Behind his courteous smile is a sickening glimmer of delight – Marcello loves the thrill and decadence of life of crime. His latent desires mix with his better nature, to create something more insidious than Simone’s overt depravity.
Dogman stumbles in its closing chapter as Marcello is released from prison, returning to a community who despises him for violating their trust and chasing Simone’s false offers of brotherhood and fortune. Marcello reemerges not exactly changed, but more honest to himself about what he is. Garrone and his co-writers steer this portion of the story with a steady hand, but it is hard to shake comparisons to other established squares-gone-rogue like Walter White.
Marcello’s resolve and vengefulness is convincing thanks to Fonte, but its emergence is sudden and teeters dangerously close to cliche. His push and pull with Simone is rote, which makes its languid pace a little irritating – this has suddenly become a very different film, and it can’t carry the slower moments of contemplation as well as it could before Marcello was locked up.
An inevitable confrontation takes place, bursting with brutality and gore. But rather than a release of tension, it feels like a betrayal of the thoughtful, measured character piece Garrone set up. The violence overreaches for shock value where Garrone had before been satisfied with something more pensive and empathetic.
Luckily, he pulls back in the final moments of the film and dovetails elegantly by concluding what is essentially his thesis on ‘little guy’ psychology. He frames Marcello not as a good man pushed too far, but as someone whose better and worse natures are intrinsically tangled to create a monster very different to the bully who ultimately leads him to snap.
No matter how kind and polite the Dogman might try to be, he cannot deny the malice that festers in his heart – and Garrone artfully distills Marcello’s melancholic final moment of self-realisation in a resonant closing shot that gracefully irons out the kinks in this curious, inconsistent little film.
Director X’s flashy remake of the Blaxploitation classic is a thunderingly dull experience
Black Panther, A Wrinkle in Time, BlackKklansman – it’s proving an impressive year for top-tier studio-driven black cinema. The perfect year, as it happens, to release a remake of seventies Blaxploitation classic Super Fly. Or, at least, it would be, if the determining creative mantra behind this update weren’t presumably anything more than to make an episode of Power with all the stylistic glimmer of a P. Diddy video.
Superfly (neatly bringing the title right up to autocorrect standard by repositioning itself as a single word) sees Grown-ish star Trevor Jackson take on the iconic role of the hustling dealer trying to earn his way out of the game – albeit in a newly millennial take that supplants the character’s own drug use for what appear to be Sherlock-level powers of information gathering on anyone he might need to manipulate, charm, or blindside. He also sports the most incredible head of hair this side of Josh Brolin.
Alex Tse’s screenplay sees no gain in revisiting any of the subversive terrain that made Super Fly the enduring classic it became, his ambitions outright stopping at the point his writing could passably sell a made-for-cable urban crime series (such as – to pick a name out of a hat – Power?). Beyond that it falls to director Director X (of the Toronto Xs) and star Jackson to bring the proverbial funk, and – though X really knows how to sell a music video with all the tonal swagger of John Singleton’s Shaft remake (though, noticeably, none of its darkness or consideration) – Jackson simply isn’t a strong enough presence to sell the supposed gravitas of his lead. It’s a weakness no amount of style or gunfire can distract from, and it sinks Superfly dead.
There’s a top-shelf supporting cast in there, with the likes of Jason Mitchell, Michael K. Williams, and Rick Ross turning up for their two cents and subsequently failing in tandem to elevate this dross to become anything close to worthy of standing in its own brand’s shadow. Expectedly enough, it sports a kickass hip-hop soundtrack – with rapper (and the film’s producer) Future offering up a bevy of atmospherically charging beats to ensure you’re at least bored to music, though there is something faintly amusing (outside of context) about hearing an entire cast prattle on about wanting to wipe out “the Snow Patrol”, like they’re working for the NME in 2005.
Twenty years from now, film historians will likely regard Superfly in the same manner as we currently regard Gus van Sant’s 1998 remake of Psycho or Stallone’s 2000 remake of Get Carter – that it’s a pointless creation that completely missed the cultural point of its own iconic original – and they’ll be right to do so. Provided they remember that Superfly even existed in the first place – which they, and you, would be decidedly better off not.
Emilia Clarke Joins Paul Feig’s Holiday Comedy Last Christmas
Game of Thrones’ mother of dragons herself, Emilia Clarke, has joined the cast of Bridesmaids director Paul Feig’s next comedy,...
Loki, Scarlet Witch, And More MCU Characters To Get TV Shows
The Grinch – Latest Trailer
Sir Patrick Stewart Joins Charlie’s Angels Reboot
Brett Cullen Replacing Alec Baldwin As Batman’s Father In Joker
Bryan Singer Eyed To Direct Red Sonja Reboot
Clueless Sean Penn Thinks That The Aim Of #MeToo “Is To Divide Men And Women”
News3 days ago
First Official Look at Joaquin Phoenix in ‘Joker’
Movie Reviews3 days ago
The Little Stranger ★★★★
News5 days ago
First Man – International Trailer
News2 days ago
Mary Poppins Returns – Official Trailer
News5 days ago
Skyfall Writers To Pen New Bond 25 Script
News2 days ago
Isabelle Huppert to receive Lifetime Achievement Award at Rome Film Fest
News2 days ago
Fan Bingbing, China’s Most Famous Actress Who Has Been Missing Since June, Now Presumed Imprisoned
News1 day ago
Clueless Sean Penn Thinks That The Aim Of #MeToo “Is To Divide Men And Women”